Pagina de start a forumului spyology spyology
intelligence and more
 
 FAQFAQ   CautareCautare   MembriMembri   GrupuriGrupuri   InregistrareInregistrare 
 ProfilProfil   Mesaje privateMesaje private   AutentificareAutentificare 

To Waterboard or Not to Waterboard?

 
Creaza un subiect nou   Raspunde la subiect    Pagina de start a forumului spyology -> SPY NEWS
Subiectul anterior :: Subiectul urmator  
Autor Mesaj
the shadow
Administrator
Administrator
the shadow

Data inscrierii: 12/Sep/2007
Mesaje: 1620
Localitate: worldwide

MesajTrimis: 30/06/2012 11:07    Titlul subiectului: To Waterboard or Not to Waterboard? Raspunde cu citat (quote)

To Waterboard or Not to Waterboard?

Waterboarding by the military has been front and center in the news media. For nearly 10 years, American officials have been criticized for waterboarding and have been accused that waterboarding interrogation techniques are a form of torture. A former CIA intelligence officer has revealed insights on this practice.

Jose Rodriguez, Jr. is the former chief of the CIA’s National Clandestine Service, and authored a book entitled “Hard Measures: How Aggressive CIA Actions After 9/11 Saved American Lives.” Regarding waterboarding as an “aggressive action,” Rodriguez describes one example of it saving countless lives. After 9/11, the CIA received intelligence from multiple sources that al-Qaida was planning an imminent second attack using unconventional weapons on the West Coast. The CIA and FBI got confirmation of these plans after they captured Osama bin Laden’s chief of operations, Abu Zubaydah. Videotapes found in his compound celebrated the impending second attack. Information they received from Abu Zubaydah enabled analysts to develop valuable new leads yielding new intel information.

Fearing another attack, Rodriguez worked with the Justice Department and an outside consulting company specializing in waterboarding to develop a waterboard protocol that would be acceptable and legal. The White House, the Justice Department and involved members of Congress all approved the protocol. What’s acceptable: water should not be dripped on prisoners for more than 40 seconds, and no session should last more than 20 minutes. What occurred: no detainee in the example cited was subjected to water for more than 10 seconds. No session lasted more than 4.5 minutes.

Paradoxically, according to Rodriguez, tens of thousands of our own U.S. military have been subjected to waterboarding as part of their training to steel them in case they were captured and had to bear waterboarding from the enemy.
_________________
informatia inseamna putere
Sus
Vezi profilul utilizatorului Trimite mesaj privat
Afiseaza mesajele pentru a le previzualiza:   
Creaza un subiect nou   Raspunde la subiect    Pagina de start a forumului spyology -> SPY NEWS Ora este GMT + 2 ore
Pagina 1 din 1

 
Mergi direct la:  
Nu puteti crea un subiect nou in acest forum
Nu puteti raspunde in subiectele acestui forum
Nu puteti modifica mesajele proprii din acest forum
Nu puteti sterge mesajele proprii din acest forum
Nu puteti vota in chestionarele din acest forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Fa-ti si tu propriul forum GRATUIT, pe www.myforum.ro